[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
George Gastaldi commented on CDI-110:
-------------------------------------
IMHO, Interceptors should not be seen as the implementation of an abstract class or
interface. They allow adding cross-cutting aspects on the implementation which should rely
on a concrete class, or a ServiceHandler if needed.
Provide support for binding an invocation handler to an interface or
abstract class
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-110
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-110
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Inheritance and Specialization
Affects Versions: 1.0
Reporter: George Gastaldi
Assignee: George Gastaldi
Labels: cdi
Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed)
The purpose of this feature is to allow interfaces and abstract classes to be
automatically implemented by an invocation handler to which all abstract method
invocations are delegated. The invocation handler would get "bound" to the type
using the same strategy as is used for interceptor binding.
Binding type:
{code:java}
@Target({ METHOD, TYPE })
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@ServiceHandlerBindingType
public @interface EchoService {}
{code}
Invocation handler:
{code:java}
@ServiceHandler
@EchoService
public class EchoServiceHandler {
@AroundInvoke
public Object invoke(InvocationContext ctx) {
return ctx.getMethod().getName().toString();
}
}
{code}
Usage:
{code:java}
@EchoService
public interface HelloWorld {
String helloWorld();
}
{code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira