Re: [cdi-dev] Need native speaker for CDI-420 (trim) reword
What you're referring to is a nuance that most users don't follow. A PAT is fired
for essentially every class found. If this works differently (e.g. for
bean-discovery-mode=none) then it may be worth calling this out, but as of now it should
be implicit that PAT works differently.
John
________________________________
From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 5:07 AM
To: Martin Kouba; John Ament; CDI Java EE Specification
Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] Need native speaker for CDI-420 (trim) reword
+1 for Martin. I didn't read with enough attention. All Types should be discovered
like in All bean-discovery mode , but only those with bean defining annotation or scope
should be eligible to become beans.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:15 AM Martin Kouba
<mkouba@redhat.com<mailto:mkouba@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi John,
sounds good but is not entirely correct because those type ARE actually
discovered (ProcessAnnotatedType is fired etc.) and then removed (if
necessary) from the set of discovered types before the "Bean discovery"
phase.
Martin
Dne 18.11.2016 v 16:50 John Ament napsal(a):
Here's my take..
"If an explicit bean archive contains the `<trim/>` element in its
`beans.xml` file, then for a type to be discovered it must have either a
scope annotation (normal or pseudo) or a bean defining annotation (as
defined in <<bean_defining_annotations>>)"
John
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org<mailto:cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
<cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org<mailto:cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>> on
behalf of Antoine Sabot-Durand
<antoine@sabot-durand.net<mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net>>
*Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 9:30 AM
*To:* CDI Java EE Specification
*Subject:* [cdi-dev] Need native speaker for CDI-420 (trim) reword
Hi all,
With Martin, we reword the <trim/> section like:
"If an explicit bean archive contains the `<trim/>` element in its
`beans.xml` file, types that don't have either a bean defining
annotation (as defined in <<bean_defining_annotations>>) or any scope
annotation, are removed from the set of discovered types."
Grammar feedback from native speaker is most welcome.
Antoine
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain
confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged information which should be
treated accordingly. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this message, and
destroy all physical and electronic copies. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.
--
Martin Kouba
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
________________________________
NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary,
and/or privileged information which should be treated accordingly. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this
message, and destroy all physical and electronic copies. Thank you.
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 6.4 KB)