Well since it's not unified across alternatives, interceptors and obsevers there still
will be some confusion IMO. So 0 from me.
T.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>
To: "CDI Java EE Specification" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 11:29:11 AM
Subject: [cdi-dev] [Vote] @Priority value order on ordered events
Hi all,
As already explained in a previous mail [1], some of us would like change the current
order of events to make the highest @Priority value first and the lowest last. This change
would be an alinement on how @Alternative work (highest value being the first candidate).
If you agree to the change (highest to lowest) vote +1, if you disagree -1 and don't
care 0. If you want to discuss thread is always open on [1] but time is running out.
Vote will end Monday at 12:00 pm CET.
Thanks for your participation.
Antoine
[1]
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/2016-November/009330.html
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.