[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Mark Struberg commented on CDI-243:
-----------------------------------
Agree that there is a problem, but I do not agree with the solution.
The underlying problem is that @Stateless beans are defined as @Dependent:
See 3.2 "A stateless session bean must belong to the @Dependent pseudo-scope."
My first feeling is that this is just plain wrong. Actually a @Stateless bean is the
complete opposite to @Dependent as it does _not_ share the lifecycle, but has no lifecycle
at all! EJBs imo do not have any CDI standard scope at all.
A @Stateless bean could rather have a @PooledScoped or similar...
By removing the @Dependent rule from @Stateless we would automatically have the rules of
5.5.7. "Injection point metadata" applied: "If a bean that declares any
scope other than @Dependent has an injection point of type InjectionPoint and qualifier
@Default, the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition
error."
Consider built-in InjectionPoint not available for stateless session
beans
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-243
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-243
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Clarification
Reporter: Martin Kouba
Right now it should be possible to inject InjectionPoint metadata to dependent SLSB (see
5.5.7. Injection point metadata). I think it may lead to inconsistencies - SLSB should not
have any state as it is usually pooled and reused for every invocation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira