Re: [cdi-dev] Ordering of AfterTypeDiscovery#getAlternatives() et al

hi 2014-12-22 9:23 GMT+01:00 Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com&gt;: > On 12/20/2014 11:26 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: >> Hi! >> >> If I have a >> >> >> @Priority(100) >> public class MyAlternative implements Foo .. >> >> and >> >> >> @Priority(101) >> public class ABetterAlternative implements Foo .. >> >> >> Then ABetterAlternative will finally be chosen. >> >> This ordering can be changed via AfterTypeDiscovery#getAlternatives(). >> >> But the spec only says "returns the ordered list of enabled alternatives for the application.." >> >> But it does NOT define in which sorting this list is ordered ;) >> >> In OWB we hat the 'most important' alternative come first. It seems in Weld it is the other way around. > What sorting do you use for interceptors and decorators? until yesterday the same as for runtime

>> I have no problem with changing this in OWB, but I would like to get this clarified in our JavaDocs and spec. > Agreed. Go ahead and file an issue. >> LieGrue, >> strub >> _______________________________________________ >> cdi-dev mailing list >> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >> >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.