Re: [cdi-dev] FW: Producer wrapper

I guess, this mail was meant to go to the list ;-) Von: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com&gt; Datum: Montag, 16. Dezember 2013 12:50 An: Arne Limburg <arne.limburg(a)openknowledge.de&gt; Betreff: Re: [cdi-dev] Producer wrapper I think the main issue is to avoid to make extensions hard/long to write (already too complicated for common stuff IMO) so i dont like this solution. It is great to have a clean design...it is better to have something usable. CDI needs to work on the last quickly IMO before adding any feature. Le 16 déc. 2013 12:38, "Arne Limburg" <arne.limburg(a)openknowledge.de&gt; a écrit : > Hi, > > > A simple solution to this topic would be to state in the spec, that, if an > extension replaces an InjectionTarget or Producer it MUST provide a custom > Implementation of an ObserverMethod for every private observer method of > that bean. > WDYT? Maybe we should discuss this in the meeting this evening? > > Regards, > Arne > > Am 12.12.13 16:23 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt;: > > > > >1. Producer / InjectionTarget might create instances which are wrapped in > >proxies. > > > >2. event observer methods are allowed to be private and thus are not in > >the proxies. > > > >3. extensions are allowed to 'decorate' InjectionTargets and Producers. > > > > > >This means that we need some unwrap method in the spec, right? > >Currently this does not York. > > > >LieGrue, > >strub > > > >_______________________________________________ > >cdi-dev mailing list > &gt;cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev