Re: [cdi-dev] Proposal for CDI-580 (intercepors for producers and custom beans)

Overall, I like it. It does expose one of the problems with our builder pattern, in that you need to go into a child to do some useful work (e.g. add Transactional). That part might be worth cleaning up in a follow up ticket. John ________________________________ From: cdi-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org <cdi-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; on behalf of Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 4:22 AM To: cdi-dev Subject: [cdi-dev] Proposal for CDI-580 (intercepors for producers and custom beans) Hi all, Please review this proposal we made during F2F meeting regarding CDI-580: https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/tree/CDI-580 [https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2632663?v=3&s=400]<https:... cdi-spec/cdi<https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/tree/CDI-580> github.com cdi - CDI specification New spi interface is: https://github.com/antoinesd/cdi-spec/blob/c68730d294e614eee127288d7daa89... usage is here: https://github.com/antoinesd/cdi-spec/tree/c68730d294e614eee127288d7daa89... Antoine ________________________________ NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged information which should be treated accordingly. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this message, and destroy all physical and electronic copies. Thank you.