Re: [cdi-dev] action items for tomorrows EG meeting
Hi guys
I've raised moving javax.enterprise.util to somewhere common (i.e. common annotations)
before with the Java EE spec leads, as the JAX-RS guys would like to be able to reuse
AnnotationLiteral and TypeLiteral. It got rejected as it was felt there wasn't enough
reason, however if we move interceptor bindings with the new @Priority annotation to
interceptors spec, then we need to put @Nonbinding somewhere common, so I've asked the
Java EE spec leads to reconsider :-)
Pete
On 10 Dec 2012, at 09:36, Jens Schumann wrote:
Hi all!
Am 09.12.12 23:33 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter <struberg(a)yahoo.de>:
> 3.) Jens pinged me offline to take a look at the current @Transactional
> discussion, but for that we need @Nonbinding in the 'new'
> commons-annotation spec. Pete recently mentioned that there is new work
> done in commons-annotation (@Priority).
Mark referred to the mail from Paul and my reply
http://java.net/projects/jta-spec/lists/users/archive/2012-12/message/0
http://java.net/projects/jta-spec/lists/users/archive/2012-12/message/1
Even though I don't like the current rollbackOn/dontRollbackOn approach
there might be a need for @NonBinding that can be used by JTA (and others)
easily. At least it would be required by the current interceptors spec.
Jens
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev