Adam, why isn't it reasonable? Also, why in the world would I want to session cope an
EM?
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 18, 2012, at 9:25, Adam Bien <abien(a)adam-bien.com> wrote:
The code above should work for Java EE 7 and CDI 1.1.
The @RequestScoped @Produces below is not that reasonable, but @SessionScoped should work
in CDI 1.1.
On 18.04.2012, at 00:37, Jason Porter wrote:
> I don't know where this should fail, but it needs to fail somewhere, and if CDI
isn't it, I trust there are people on this list the other EGs will listen to because
too many of them ignore the users list, because you know, they're the
"experts".
>
> public class EmProducer() {
> @PersistenceContext(type = PersistenceContextType.EXTENDED)
> EntityManager em;
>
> @Produces @RequestScoped
> public EntityManager getEntityManager() {
> return em;
> }
> }
>
> That should be a deployment exception stating it isn't valid (the
@PersistenceContext injection).
>
> --
> Jason Porter
>
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
>
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
>
> Software Engineer
> Open Source Advocate
> Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling
>
> PGP key id: 926CCFF5
> PGP key available at:
keyserver.net,
pgp.mit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev