]
Marius Bogoevici commented on CDI-186:
--------------------------------------
This is the best explanation on 'inheritance' so far:
"Bindings defined at method level will replace the bindings of the same type of the
class"
Interceptor bindings need clarification
---------------------------------------
Key: CDI-186
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-186
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Clarification
Components: Interceptors
Affects Versions: 1.1.EDR
Reporter: Jozef Hartinger
Assignee: Marius Bogoevici
Fix For: 1.1.PRD
As part of CDI-2, changes were made to the Interceptors chapter of the CDI specification.
These changes need further clarification:
{quote}
Interceptor bindings defined on methods may override the interceptor bindings defined on
classes.
{quote}
One way to interpret this is that the set of interceptor bindings defined on a method
overrides the set of interceptor bindings defined on a class, which is clearly not the
intended behavior.
{quote}
If the set of interceptor bindings of a bean
or interceptor, including bindings inherited from stereotypes and other
interceptor bindings, has two instances of a certain interceptor binding type
and the instances have different values of some annotation member, the bean
or interceptor must override the *inherited set* by definining an annotation
instance of its own, otherwise, the container automatically detects the problem
and treats it as a definition error.
{quote}
Here again I would avoid referencing "the inherited set", since it's not
clear what that means, and rather use wording similar to the section 2.4.4 - default scope
of a stereotype.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: