Re: [cdi-dev] Moving to JSR-348

+1 (we already voted on this, didn't we?) LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: Joseph Bergmark <bergmark(a)us.ibm.com>; norman.erck(a)holisticon.de; mathieu.ancelin(a)gmail.com; George Gastaldi <gegastaldi(a)gmail.com>; Richard Hightower <richardhightower(a)gmail.com>; Werner Keil <werner.keil(a)gmx.net>; Jérôme Petit <jerome.petit(a)serli.com>; Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>; Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de>; Sivakumar Thyagarajan <sivakumar.thyagarajan(a)oracle.com&gt; > Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 11:18 AM > Subject: Moving to JSR-348 > > Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine, Mark, Siva, > > We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348. > > The JCP PMO have raised two points: > > 1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page > http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move. > 2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members. We've > not used that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you to > remove that private alias. > > Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at > https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to subscribe to > cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev anyway. > > Pete >