Re: [cdi-dev] Minutes from EG meeting 20/08/2012
Or just say that if you want to add >1 annotated type based on the same class you must
specify a unique id for it?
On 21 Aug 2012, at 23:00, Stuart Douglas wrote:
I have actually been thinking about this. What if we say that any
additional added AnnotatedTypes are not passivation capable, but then add an additional
version of addAnnotatedType() where the extension explicitly specifies the bean id to make
it passivation capable?