[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-487) Clarify decorator beans relationship to EJB spec

Tomas Remes created CDI-487: ------------------------------- Summary: Clarify decorator beans relationship to EJB spec Key: CDI-487 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-487 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Components: Decorators, Java EE integration Affects Versions: 1.2.Final Reporter: Tomas Remes In "8.1. Decorator beans" there are two following sentences: {quote} Decorators of a session bean must comply with the bean provider programming restrictions defined by the EJB specification. Decorators of a stateful session bean must comply with the rules for instance passivation and conversational state defined by the EJB specification. {quote} I guess the first sentence corresponds "somehow" to "4.9 The Responsibilities of the Bean Provider" in EJB spec. This EJB chapter (specifically 4.9.2) specifies e.g that session bean class must not be abstract. This seems to contradict bit with abstract decorator for session bean, which is legal in CDI. This restriction would be IMO unnecessary. I am also not sure about implications of the second sentence. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)