[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Mark Struberg commented on CDI-106:
-----------------------------------
Yea, I know what you mean and we already discussed this in the past. Basically it's a
matter of taste.
Gavins argument was that a certified CDI container (all TCK passes) needs to support the
whole EE range. But every implementation is also free to define a stripped down variant
on it's own - which is then _not_ spec compliant.
We could of course try to define a minimum feature set of functionality for running in a
SE environment. But then politics kick in! JSR-299 was originally EXPLICITLY defines as
for Java ENTERPRISE! And extending this to SE was kind of a blasphemy already. For
example: check the history of the CDI spec name
Just trust me, you don't like to know all the gory details ... ;)
Support JMS mappings
--------------------
Key: CDI-106
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-106
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Feature Request
Reporter: Pete Muir
Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira