InterceptionFactory sounds fine for me.
LieGrue,
strub
On Monday, 7 November 2016, 15:55, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello Antoine,
concurrency-utilities use ContextFactory for something pretty close (a proxying adding
spec features over invocations) which is less "cglib-like" than
"Enhancer" so I'd like to keep Factory. In the list InterceptionFactory
looks clear enough. We neevr speak of business method anymore I think so it would add a
difficulty for something very useful to go that deep in the naming I think.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | JavaEE Factory
2016-11-07 15:44 GMT+01:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>:
Hi all,
>
>
>In my last review for CDI-580 (
https://github.com/cdi-spec/ cdi/pull/315), I removed
all reference to proxies in Javadoc and spec doc following various feedback.
>So now the name of the interface is the only one dealing with Proxy, so we really need
to find it a new name.
>I listed some proposal in PR 315:
>- InstanceEnhancer (short but not very clear)
>- BusinessMethodInvocationFactor y (more exact from spec pov, but is it clear from
user pov?)
>- InterceptionFactory (cleared from user pov and near our initial name)
>- InterceptionEnhancer
>
>
>Feedback and other names are welcome.
>
>
>Antoine
>______________________________ _________________
>cdi-dev mailing list
>cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>https://lists.jboss.org/ mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
>Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/ licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all
other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.
>
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.