Re: [cdi-dev] Minutes from EG meeting 20/08/2012
I've looked at the spec, and bean's which aren't enabled shouldn't pass
through ProcessBean, and other such container lifecycle events.
Jozef, can you check Weld for us, and see if this is actually implemented?
On 21 Aug 2012, at 14:45, Pete Muir wrote:
@Veto
=====
Pete proposed dropping @Veto, and instead being able to declaratively and explicitly
control whether a bean is enabled or disabled. Pete to write up full proposal.