Re: [cdi-dev] [Vote] for CDI-527 / PR 271 allow proxying of classes with non-private final methods

Hi all, There have been a lot of discussion around CDI-527 in the last weeks: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-527 Mark proposed a PR: https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/271 But we don't agree on adding this feature to the spec. This vote is to decide if we should add this feature at the spec level now, or not. Should we vote this feature down, that won't mean it will be completely dropped: it could be implemented as non portable feature in both Spec or even be included as experimental feature in the spec (in annexes) as describe in the PR comments Vote starts now, only vote from EG members are binding (but you can give your opinion if not part of the EG) and will last 72 hours. You vote with the following values: +1 : I'm favorable for adding this feature in the spec -1 : I'm against adding this feature in the spec 0 : I don't care Thank you for your attention and your vote. Antoine Sabot-Durand _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.