They could certainly support the smallest CDI module/profile. The way the proposal looks,
it should be pretty tiny and almost just the same as JSR 330.
On Mar 19, 2016, at 11:57 AM, aalmiray <aalmiray(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
How would this move affect existing implementations, such as Guice,
Springframework, Dagger, Afterburner, Griffon, etc? These implementations
rely on a tiny core (the small JSR-330 JAR file) and nothing more.
What are the foreseeable consequences of such move (as a subspec)?
Cheers,
Andres
--
View this message in context:
http://cdi-development-mailing-list.1064426.n5.nabble.com/Merging-JSR-330...
Sent from the CDI Development mailing list mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.