I am lurking and enjoying the direction of the thread. :)
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Reza Rahman <reza_rahman(a)lycos.com> wrote:
Cool – thanks for the kind words J.****
** **
*From:* Fabien Marsaud [mailto:fabmars@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 22, 2012 8:30 PM
*To:* Reza Rahman
*Cc:* cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
*Subject:* Re: [cdi-dev] Transaction Scope for CDI****
** **
My thought about the document is: Okay! It's logical, consistent,
reasonable.
I'll let you guys fight over the eventual location of @TrasnactionScoped
Regards
fm.
****
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Reza Rahman <reza_rahman(a)lycos.com>
wrote:****
CDI enthusiasts,****
****
Pete, I and Nigel (JMS 2 spec lead) have been discussing the issue of the
transaction scope behind the scenes the past few weeks. Attached is what we
came up with and feel it meets the various related use-cases the most
effectively. The downside is that it is quite involved (conceptually) and
might take a bit of patience to absorb. Please give it a read and let me
know your thoughts.****
****
Cheers,****
Reza****
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev****
--
http://www.suntriprecords.com****
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev