Re: [cdi-dev] Fw: Re: CDI 1.1

btw, can the mailing daemon be configured to automatically contain the list as mail-to? :) LieGrue, strub --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; wrote: > From: Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; > Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1 > To: "Peter Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; > Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 12:06 PM > is fine with me. > > I just found it a good idea to encourage people to use the > voting feature of jira. People are not using it often since > it is most times ignored. If the votes actually have a real > impact, then people will use it more often - which would in > turn provide a good feedback for the EG. > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> From: Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; >> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1 >> To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; >> Cc: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 12:01 PM >> I see. We can consider doing >> something like this - I guess what I have asked people > to do >> initially is equivalent to the feasibility check. We > can >> open it up to the community for after the kick off con > call >> and get their feedback on whether we are going in the > right >> direction. How does that sound? >> >> On 27 Apr 2011, at 12:57, Mark Struberg wrote: >> >>> The EG and extended EG first worked through all > the >> Jira issues and did some documentation and > feasibility >> checks. Before finishing the spec he called for > feedback in >> the community basically asking them to vote for the > jira >> issues (directly in jira) they see as most important > to get >> fixed. >>> >>> >>> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/edburns/archive/2011/04/25/vote-your-top-fiv... >>> >>> http://java.net/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?requestId=10523 >>> >>> Actually your own uidata issue comes out on top > ;) >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >>> >>>> From: Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1 >>>> To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; >>>> Cc: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >>>> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 11:49 AM >>>> Can you briefly explain the system he >>>> used? >>>> >>>> On 27 Apr 2011, at 12:47, Mark Struberg > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Congratulations Pete! >>>>> >>>>> What do you think about a public voting > as Ed >> did with >>>> JSF-2.2? >>>>> Could give some good feedback. >>>>> >>>>> LieGrue, >>>>> strub >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> From: Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>>> Subject: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1 >>>>>> To: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >>>>>> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, > 11:25 AM >>>>>> Hi everyone >>>>>> >>>>>> Welcome to the CDI 1.1 expert group. > I've >> started >>>> to >>>>>> collect some resources at https://github.com/pmuir/cdi/wiki. Please take some >>>>>> time to read through them. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like everyone to work their > way >> through >>>> the various >>>>>> lists of issues in JIRA https://github.com/pmuir/cdi/wiki/CDI-1.1-issues and >>>> do >>>>>> four things: >>>>>> >>>>>> * If you are aware of an issue that > is >> not >>>> recorded, please >>>>>> create one >>>>>> * If you think an issue on the TBC > list >> should be >>>> addressed >>>>>> in CDI 1.1 then please make a note > of >> this, and >>>> prepare an >>>>>> email to this list explaining why > you >> think the >>>> issue should >>>>>> be included. Please restrict yourself > to >> three >>>> such issues. >>>>>> * If you think an issue on the > proposed >> list >>>> shouldn't be >>>>>> addressed then please make a note of > this, >> and >>>> prepare an >>>>>> email to this list explaining why > you >> think the >>>> issue >>>>>> shouldn't be included. Please > restrict >> yourself to >>>> three >>>>>> such issues. >>>>>> * Write a note to the list indicating > what >> issues >>>> you are >>>>>> going to take a lead on. For major > issues, >> prepare >>>> a 2 >>>>>> minute summary for the concall so > that you >> can >>>> brief people >>>>>> on the issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> The (soft) deadline for this exercise > is >> Wednesday >>>> 11th >>>>>> May. Of course, we can continue to > debate >> the >>>> merits of >>>>>> issues after this, but to make things > run >> smoothly >>>> it will >>>>>> help a lot if we can get this done >> quickly! >>>>>> >>>>>> I propose we have conference call on >> Thursday 12th >>>> May to >>>>>> kick off, overview the main issues > facing >> us and >>>> run through >>>>>> who will take what issues. Here is > my >> proposed >>>> slot - http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CDI+Kick+off+con... >>>>>> - it's difficult to find something >> suitable for >>>> everyone, >>>>>> but this does allow both people in >> Australia (late >>>> night) >>>>>> and the US West Coast (our two > extremes) >> to >>>> particpate. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any comments or suggestions welcome, >>>>>> >>>>>> Pete >>>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> cdi-dev mailing list >>>>>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev