Re: [cdi-dev] Duplicate javax.annotation packages and Java 9

> Now that JDK9 is out, if we want EE4J 9 (or whatever it's version will > be) to support jigsaw, we'll probably have to change packages names :-(. What packages do you have in mind? We don't "own" javax.annotation and we cannot introduce our own priority annotation...

I encountered the same type of collision with java.transaction.InvalidTransactionException which is in the JDK and in JTA. I remember sending this problem to jigsaw ML [1], but obviously they didn't have time to do something or expect having Java EE spec do the required stuff :-(. Now that JDK9 is out, if we want EE4J 9 (or whatever it's version will be) to support jigsaw, we'll probably have to change packages names :-(.

Antoine [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2016-July/008779.html On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:51 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com <mailto:mkouba@redhat.com>> wrote:     For the record, the CDI API itself does not define a dependency on     javax.annotation at all.     In fact, I'm wondering why @Priority is not part of JDK?? I suppose the     reasons are similar to why javax.annotation.Priority only has     @Target({TYPE,PARAMETER}) (even if we tried to push other element     types :-(.     M     Dne 21.10.2017 v 16:22 John Ament napsal(a):       > Hey all       >       >       > Not sure where else to turn 😊       >       >       > I'm trying to start testing my apps on Java 9, I believe Java 9 kicks       > back the javax.annotation dependency that CDI declares due to a     package       > collision with the built in JDK's javax.annotation package       >     <https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/javax/annotation/package-summar...;.       > The errors I get are due to missing javax/annotation/Priority.  I'm       > wondering if anyone else has tried this, and if there's a clean     work around?       >       >       > John       >       >     ------------------------------------------------------------------------       > NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain       > confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged information which     should be       > treated accordingly. If you are not the intended recipient, please       > notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this     message, and       > destroy all physical and electronic copies. Thank you.       >       >       > _______________________________________________       > cdi-dev mailing list       > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>       > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev       >       > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider     licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2     (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.       >     --     Martin Kouba     Senior Software Engineer     Red Hat, Czech Republic     _______________________________________________     cdi-dev mailing list     cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev     Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses     the code under the Apache License, Version 2     (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.