[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Scott Marlow edited comment on CDI-162 at 9/18/12 8:52 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
AS7-4940 isn't directly related, but impacts whether the extended persistence context
inheritance will be simple single level (shallow) or multiple level (deep). The [JPA 2.1
eg had some discussion but tabled
it|http://java.net/nonav/projects/jpa-spec/lists/users/archive/2012-06/me...], until
there is more interest from developers expressed. Currently, AS7-4940 is only about a
JBoss AS extension. I don't think it directly impacts this effort but something to
note for future reference back to this discussion.
From an AS clustering point of view, we could ask the clustering team
some specific questions about doing some work on this (whether it would be done via an API
or directly managed by the clustering layer (on AS). For this purposes of CDI-162,
I'm more concerned about whether clustering is possible. I think different
application servers would have to implement their *own* API that accomplishes
passivation/clustering solution that includes managed beans as if they were stateful beans
(IMO).
was (Author: smarlow):
AS7-4940 isn't directly related, but impacts whether the extended persistence
context inheritance will be simple single level (shallow) or multiple level (deep). The
[JPA 2.1 eg had some discussion but tabled
it|http://java.net/nonav/projects/jpa-spec/lists/users/archive/2012-06/me...], until
there is more interest from developers expressed. Currently, AS7-4940 is only about a
JBoss AS extension. I don't think it directly impacts this effort but something to
note for future reference back to this discussion.
From an AS clustering point of view, we could ask the clustering team
some specific questions about doing some work on this (whether it would be done via an API
or directly managed by the clustering layer (on AS). For this purposes of CDI-162,
I'm more concerned about whether clustering is possible. I think different
application servers would have to implement their API that accomplishes
passivation/clustering solution that includes managed beans as if they were stateful beans
(IMO).
Support Extended Persistence Contexts in Managed beans
------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-162
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-162
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Tracker
Affects Versions: 1.0
Reporter: Pete Muir
Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira