Re: [cdi-dev] pull requests broken?

Oki txs. Is 2.0-EDR2 now the official work branch for time time coming? I cannot find any mail nor log where this got discussed or announced. Did I miss something? How does it look like for the CDI-TCK? Which branch to use for it? txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 16.01.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Antoine Sabot-Durand < antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt;: > > Hi Mark, > > There was nothing done recently on the repo. The last big change was my request to make it the main repo (it was mark as a fork of Ales before that), but it was 2 years ago. > You should add the remote again on your local repo. > Don't forget to make your PR on 2.0-EDR2 branch. > > Antoine > > Le sam. 16 janv. 2016 à 10:51, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; a écrit : > hi folks! > > I cannot send a pull-request anymore. Only got pete and ales in the fork upstream network list. The official cdi-spec repo is gone from my list. The sha1 chain is fine though. > Got this broken by some tinkering with the official repo or is github broken? > > LieGrue, > strub > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 ( http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.