Re: [cdi-dev] Support DI within BV constant validators
On 15 août 2012, at 12:57, Pete Muir wrote:
On 14 Aug 2012, at 21:47, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>> I would guess BV, but it depends on the details.
>
> In the light of what you've been saying before about moving the
> description of integration points away from the Java EE spec to the
> individual technology specs this seems reasonable.
>
> Actually that's what we're basically already doing as of BV 1.1 early
> draft 1 as mentioned before [1]. Maybe the section just needs to get a
> bit more authoritative then. Although it might be a bit difficult for
> a Java EE implementor to find all integration requirements within the
> individual technology specs.
>
> Pete, should the note on built-in beans for Validator and
> ValidatorFactory from CDI spec. 3.7 be moved over to BV then? Let's
> see what Emmanuel thinks on this.
This would be good IMO. Gunnar, are you happy to raise this with Emmanuel/BV EG?
All good for me. I'd rather have everything at one place and BVal is a good enough
place.