What would be the interest of having CDI object to call getBeanManager() instead of having
the bean manager directly ?
Antoine
Le 23 oct. 2014 à 03:13, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>
a écrit :
Hi Antoine,
For the SE feature, I think the return type on the initialize() methods should be CDI
instead of BeanManager. What do you think?
John
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net
<mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net>> wrote:
Hi guys,
New post on the blog : Check what was discussed in our last week F2F meeting.
http://www.cdi-spec.org/news/2014/10/20/CDI-2_0-first-face-to-face-meetin...
<
http://www.cdi-spec.org/news/2014/10/20/CDI-2_0-first-face-to-face-meetin...
Regards,
Antoine
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html
<
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html>). For all other ideas provided on
this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent
in such information.