Hi all, In a recent discussion with Martin, I realized that the use of @Priotiy is not consistent in CDI 1.2: - For Interceptor and decorator the lowest value in @Priority is first (def in interceptor spec and 8.2.1) - For Alternatives the Highest value in @Priroty is first (def in 5.2.2) Since we have these different interpretation of @Priority value in the spec , we may find more consistent to change the definition of event ordering with the @Priority annotation. Right now we have: "Observers with smaller priority values are called first" We may find more intuitive to change it to: "Observers with higher priority values are called first" It will remove the oxymoron effect of the sentence and align this ordering on @Alternative way of using @Priorty. Wdyt? Antoine