[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Martin Andersson commented on CDI-280: -------------------------------------- What is a "tenant proxy"? You mean a proxy written by the application developer himself? If so, then I'd not worry about it at all. Half of the rest is related to EJB and JPA. If CDI enforce different proxy types, then it should be clarified (but it doesn't right?). "CDI proxy" would be a valid term that encapsulate all types (but again, there are no different CDI proxy types?), or just "proxy" for short. The bottom line is that if we deal with a proxy, why not just call it that? Everything in the spec is "contextual" already. The word feels a bit bloated. Actually, I think that the word "proxy" is one of those things that is quite clear without semantic noise. Now you want to replace all references made to a proxy with "contextual reference"? I just don't get it why. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)