Tomas Remes created CDI-441: ------------------------------- Summary: Enhance wording for indirect specialization in 4.3.1 Key: CDI-441 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-441 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Components: Inheritance and Specialization Affects Versions: 1.2.Final Reporter: Tomas Remes In the 4.3.1. Direct and indirect specialization is following: {quote} Formally, a bean X is said to specialize another bean Y if either: • X directly specializes Y, or • a bean Z exists, such that X directly specializes Z and Z specializes Y. {quote} It is not fully straightforward to deduce that the second point here is not just redundant first case, but rather transitive relationship in indirect specialization. Therefore I think the wording for indirect specialization should be enhanced. Explanation from Jozef is at http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/2014-June/005082.html. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.3#6260)