[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Mark Struberg edited comment on CDI-420 at 5/4/16 8:36 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
As already clarified with [~antoinesabot-durand] it is not possible to amend the behaviour
of "annotated".
But it actually *only* provides a benefit for bean-discovery-mode="all" as you
will _not_ get interfaces etc for ProcessAnnotatedType if you use "annotated".
Thus this new flag only makes sense in combination with "all". Which makes it
basically an own sub-flavour and thus it's really the same like introducing a new
bean-discovery-mode in the end.
was (Author: struberg):
As already clarified with [~antoinesabot-durand] it is not possible to amend the behaviour
of "annotated".
But it also provides a benefit for "all" as you will _not_ get interfaces etc
for ProcessAnnotatedType if you use "annotated". Thus this new flag only makes
sense in combination with "all". Which makes it basically an own sub-flavour and
thus it's really the same like introducing a new bean-discovery-mode in the end.
add a bean-discovery-mode 'scoped'
----------------------------------
Key: CDI-420
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-420
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Packaging and Deployment
Affects Versions: TBD
Reporter: Mark Struberg
Fix For: 2.0 (discussion)
This is for some future CDI release.
We currently only have 3 bean-discovery-modes
* none
* all
* annotated
The spec also currently says that ProcessAnnotatedType will only get fired (12.4) for
• each Java class, interface or enum deployed in an explicit bean archive, and
• each Java class with a bean defining annotation in an implicit bean archive.
• each session bean
Which means that we do not get the ProcessAnnotatedType (PAT) event for any class in an
'annotated' or 'implicit' BDA which does _not_ have a bean defining
annotation.
It might be useful to fire the ProcessAnnotatedType for all classes, but do not pick them
up as Beans if they (after PAT) do not have a valid scope. Effectively doing the
processing but not make them @Dependent automatically if there is no scope annotation at
the end of the PAT processing.
I'm not yet 100% sure how important this distinction is in practice. Just writing
this up to not forget about the idea...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)