I just raised a PR for 690. If we think its too big let me know, but I believe this is how it works today in the RI. John ________________________________ From: John Ament Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 9:12 AM To: Antoine Sabot-Durand; cdi-dev Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] Public review ballot result Hi Antoine, Great news about the ballot. I will mention it in my talk today! There's two I can think of. CDI-697 raised yesterday by Laird looks like it can just be a clarification in the spec. CDI-690 raised by me last week. I think we can call this a clarification as well, it sounds like the intention was that this exists in the common area not the EE specific area. WDYT? John ________________________________ From: cdi-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org <cdi-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; on behalf of Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 7:48 AM To: cdi-dev Subject: [cdi-dev] Public review ballot result Hi all, So the public review ballot closed yesterday and all EC member voted yes. Result is here: [1] So we are entering the PFD (proposed final draft) step. We still have one PR open and if you'd like to see some typo or clarification tickets being added to PFD it's still time to discuss as I plan to propose the PFD by the end of the week. When PFD will be submitted, it will trigger a final vote (2 weeks) and if it is accepted final version will be submitted. Antoine [1] https://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5925 ________________________________ NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged information which should be treated accordingly. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this message, and destroy all physical and electronic copies. Thank you.