[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Aslak Knutsen updated CDI-158: ------------------------------ Description: CDI Extensions in EE6 can only rewrite/change/work upon CDI registered beans. This should be extended to include _any_ EE component. e.g. * Change/Add @Resource InjectionPoint in a EJB * Change/Add @Path on JAX-RS Resource handlers * Change/Add @MassageDriven on a MDB * Change/Add JPA Annotations * Change/Add @TransactionAttributes on EJBs * Change/Add @RunAs on EJBs * Change/Add @WebService on EJBs * Change/Add @WebServlet etc. on Servlets * Change/Add @Timer on EJB ++++ was: CDI Extensions in EE6 can only rewrite/change/work upon CDI registered beans. This should be extended to include _any_ EE component. e.g. * Change/Add @Resource InjectionPoint in a EJB * Change/Add @Path on JAX-RS Resource handlers * Change/Add @MassageDriven on a MDB * Change/Add JPA Annotations * Change/Add @TransactionAttributes on EJBs * Change/Add @RunAs on EJBs * Change/Add @WebService on EJBs * Change/Add @WebServlet etc. on Servlets -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Stuart Douglas commented on CDI-158: ------------------------------------ Are you taking about modifying all EJB and EE metadata via PAT events? This would be a very major change. From an AS7 perspective this would require a fairly big re-work of all affected subsystems, and would also have a negative performance impact as all services would end up with a dependency on weld bootstrap. I imagine other app servers would also require fairly major changes to support this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Mark Struberg commented on CDI-158: ----------------------------------- But that would imo require that all the other systems like EJB and JPA would need to introduce proper SPIs first, isn't. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] David Lloyd commented on CDI-158: --------------------------------- I agree, this would destroy performance. This looks nice from a top-down perspective but the harsh reality is that if you want performance, you have to provide features based on what the underlying software is actually capable of doing efficiently, and try to meet the user requirements from that direction. And if you're clever enough, you can manage it. But this isn't it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira