[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on CDI-496:
----------------------------------------
Isnt the issue just the fact "contract" of Beans is not exlpicit? contract of an
EJB is its API (Local, Local Bean or Remote), for a ManagedBean it is its explicit or
implicit @Typed, etc...In summary it is bean.getTypes() no?
Clarification (or completion) for interceptor binding to session
bean
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-496
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-496
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Clarification
Reporter: Tomas Remes
It's not clear if the session bean can have interceptor binding and what rules (if
any) apply to this case. In the beginning of chapter 9. Interceptor bindings there is
following statement:
{quote}Managed beans and EJB session and message-driven beans support
interception.{quote}
But at the end of "9.3. Binding an interceptor to a bean" There is only:
{quote}
If a managed bean has a class-level or method-level interceptor binding, the managed bean
must
be a proxyable bean type, as defined in Section 3.15, “Unproxyable bean types”.
{quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)