Agreed. This does not look right. On 06/04/2014 06:13 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi! > > I came across this in org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.producer.method.definition.ProducerMethodDefinitionTest ,but other methods might contain something similar: > > @Test > @SpecAssertions({ @SpecAssertion(section = DISPOSER_METHOD, id = "b") }) > public void testStaticDisposerMethod() throws Exception { > assert getBeans(String.class, TAME_LITERAL).size() == 1; > String aString = getContextualReference(String.class, TAME_LITERAL); > Bean<String> stringBean = getBeans(String.class, TAME_LITERAL).iterator().next(); > CreationalContext<String> creationalContext = getCurrentManager().createCreationalContext(stringBean); > stringBean.destroy(aString, creationalContext); > assert BeanWithStaticProducerMethod.stringDestroyed; > } > > > the Dependent producer gets called via BeanManager#getReference _internally_ by using a 'throw away' CreationalContext > And then you later create a _new_ CreationalContext and use this for bean.destroy. > > We should rather use the original CC. As is it now, this test is on the edge of being illegal ;) > > LieGrue, > strub > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev