]
Antoine Sabot-Durand reassigned CDI-563:
----------------------------------------
Assignee: Antoine Sabot-Durand
Event.fireAsync() - clarify the usage of the returned
CompletionStage
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-563
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-563
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Clarification
Components: Events
Affects Versions: 2.0-EDR1
Reporter: Martin Kouba
Assignee: Antoine Sabot-Durand
Fix For: 2.0-EDR2
So far {{CompletionStage}} is only mentioned in "10.5.1. Handling multiple
exceptions thrown during an asynchronous event" and the {{Event.fireAsync()}} javadoc
is too general. However, the {{CompletionStage}} itself does not define an unambiguous
contract for its methods. E.g. what thread is used to execute a given callback? Or
what's the _"stage's default asynchronous execution facility"_? I
believe this is left on implementors. In Weld 3.0 Alpha we're using
{{CompletableFuture}} under the hood, and its more concrete in this area, e.g.:
{quote}
* Actions supplied for dependent completions of _non-async_ methods may be performed by
the thread that completes the current CompletableFuture, or by any other caller of a
completion method.
{quote}
So as a result, if an async delivery is finished before a sync dependent action is
registered, the callback is executed in the caller thread:
{code:java}
event.fireAsync(new Message()).thenAccept((m) -> System.out.println("This might
be executed in a caller thread or in a different thread!"));
{code}
And this might be confusing. Especially from the context propagation point of view. I
think the spec should clarify the contract of a returned {{CompletionStage}}.