1:43 p.m.
Hi,
Let's suppose I'm deploying a WAR file w/ multiple JAR files. The WAR has
a beans.xml w/ interceptors defined in it. The JARs each have beans.xml,
but no interceptors defined within them.
Should the interceptors in the WAR apply to all of the JAR files?
Thanks,
John
4:10 a.m.
Hi John,
no, the interceptor will only be enabled in war's WEB-INF/classes. Other
JARs need to enable the interceptor in their beans.xml file to use it.
Jozef
On 08/21/2014 08:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
Hi,
Let's suppose I'm deploying a WAR file w/ multiple JAR files. The WAR
has a beans.xml w/ interceptors defined in it. The JARs each have
beans.xml, but no interceptors defined within them.
Should the interceptors in the WAR apply to all of the JAR files?
Thanks,
John
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
6:05 a.m.
Hi John, from spec point of view Jozef is right but I think it is
important to mention that most of servers supports it otherwise it is
hardly usable (using lib would be a nightmare).
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-22 11:10 GMT+02:00 Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com>:
Hi John,
no, the interceptor will only be enabled in war's WEB-INF/classes. Other
JARs need to enable the interceptor in their beans.xml file to use it.
Jozef
On 08/21/2014 08:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
Hi,
Let's suppose I'm deploying a WAR file w/ multiple JAR files. The WAR has a
beans.xml w/ interceptors defined in it. The JARs each have beans.xml, but
no interceptors defined within them.
Should the interceptors in the WAR apply to all of the JAR files?
Thanks,
John
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
6:21 a.m.
@Romain
I'm inclined to believe that. Either way I just created
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-453 so that none of us lose track of it.
John
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi John, from spec point of view Jozef is right but I think it is
important to mention that most of servers supports it otherwise it is
hardly usable (using lib would be a nightmare).
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-22 11:10 GMT+02:00 Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com>:
> Hi John,
>
> no, the interceptor will only be enabled in war's WEB-INF/classes. Other
> JARs need to enable the interceptor in their beans.xml file to use it.
>
> Jozef
>
>
> On 08/21/2014 08:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Let's suppose I'm deploying a WAR file w/ multiple JAR files. The WAR
has a
> beans.xml w/ interceptors defined in it. The JARs each have beans.xml,
but
> no interceptors defined within them.
>
> Should the interceptors in the WAR apply to all of the JAR files?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
3:36 a.m.
I don't believe this is clearly defined in the spec.
See https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-129 and the discussion in CDI-18 as well.
EARs are in general just frigging broken/underspecified. But this is actually not (only) a
CDI issue but a result of the missing isolation/Classloader behaviour specification in the
EE umbrella spec.
LieGrue,
strub
On Friday, 22 August 2014, 13:22, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com> wrote:
@Romain
I'm inclined to believe that. Either way I just
created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-453 so that none of us lose track of it.
John
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi John, from spec point of view Jozef is right but I think it is
>important to mention that most of servers supports it otherwise it is
>hardly usable (using lib would be a nightmare).
>
>
>Romain Manni-Bucau
>Twitter: @rmannibucau
>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>2014-08-22 11:10 GMT+02:00 Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com>:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> no, the interceptor will only be enabled in war's WEB-INF/classes. Other
>> JARs need to enable the interceptor in their beans.xml file to use it.
>>
>> Jozef
>>
>>
>> On 08/21/2014 08:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Let's suppose I'm deploying a WAR file w/ multiple JAR files. The WAR
has a
>> beans.xml w/ interceptors defined in it. The JARs each have beans.xml, but
>> no interceptors defined within them.
>>
>> Should the interceptors in the WAR apply to all of the JAR files?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
10:43 a.m.
Since CDI 1.1 you can enable an interceptor, decorator or alternative
globally. This can be done either using the @Priority annotation or by
an extension.
Jozef
On 08/22/2014 01:21 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
@Romain
I'm inclined to believe that. Either way I just created
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-453 so that none of us lose track
of it.
John
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rmannibucau(a)gmail.com <mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi John, from spec point of view Jozef is right but I think it is
important to mention that most of servers supports it otherwise it is
hardly usable (using lib would be a nightmare).
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-22 11:10 GMT+02:00 Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com
<mailto:jharting@redhat.com>>:
> Hi John,
>
> no, the interceptor will only be enabled in war's
WEB-INF/classes. Other
> JARs need to enable the interceptor in their beans.xml file to
use it.
>
> Jozef
>
>
> On 08/21/2014 08:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Let's suppose I'm deploying a WAR file w/ multiple JAR files.
The WAR has a
> beans.xml w/ interceptors defined in it. The JARs each have
beans.xml, but
> no interceptors defined within them.
>
> Should the interceptors in the WAR apply to all of the JAR files?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
3796
days inactive
3798
days old
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
John D. Ament -
Jozef Hartinger -
Mark Struberg -
Romain Manni-Bucau