8:43 p.m.
Hi,
Let's suppose I'm deploying a WAR file w/ multiple JAR files. The WAR has
a beans.xml w/ interceptors defined in it. The JARs each have beans.xml,
but no interceptors defined within them.
Should the interceptors in the WAR apply to all of the JAR files?
Thanks,
John
11:10 a.m.
Hi John,
no, the interceptor will only be enabled in war's WEB-INF/classes. Other
JARs need to enable the interceptor in their beans.xml file to use it.
Jozef
On 08/21/2014 08:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
Hi,
Let's suppose I'm deploying a WAR file w/ multiple JAR files. The WAR
has a beans.xml w/ interceptors defined in it. The JARs each have
beans.xml, but no interceptors defined within them.
Should the interceptors in the WAR apply to all of the JAR files?
Thanks,
John
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
1:05 p.m.
Hi John, from spec point of view Jozef is right but I think it is
important to mention that most of servers supports it otherwise it is
hardly usable (using lib would be a nightmare).
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-22 11:10 GMT+02:00 Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com>:
Hi John,
no, the interceptor will only be enabled in war's WEB-INF/classes. Other
JARs need to enable the interceptor in their beans.xml file to use it.
Jozef
On 08/21/2014 08:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
Hi,
Let's suppose I'm deploying a WAR file w/ multiple JAR files. The WAR has a
beans.xml w/ interceptors defined in it. The JARs each have beans.xml, but
no interceptors defined within them.
Should the interceptors in the WAR apply to all of the JAR files?
Thanks,
John
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
1:21 p.m.
@Romain
I'm inclined to believe that. Either way I just created
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-453 so that none of us lose track of it.
John
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi John, from spec point of view Jozef is right but I think it is
important to mention that most of servers supports it otherwise it is
hardly usable (using lib would be a nightmare).
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-22 11:10 GMT+02:00 Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com>:
> Hi John,
>
> no, the interceptor will only be enabled in war's WEB-INF/classes. Other
> JARs need to enable the interceptor in their beans.xml file to use it.
>
> Jozef
>
>
> On 08/21/2014 08:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Let's suppose I'm deploying a WAR file w/ multiple JAR files. The WAR
has a
> beans.xml w/ interceptors defined in it. The JARs each have beans.xml,
but
> no interceptors defined within them.
>
> Should the interceptors in the WAR apply to all of the JAR files?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
10:36 a.m.
I don't believe this is clearly defined in the spec.
See https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-129 and the discussion in CDI-18 as well.
EARs are in general just frigging broken/underspecified. But this is actually not (only) a
CDI issue but a result of the missing isolation/Classloader behaviour specification in the
EE umbrella spec.
LieGrue,
strub
On Friday, 22 August 2014, 13:22, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com> wrote:
@Romain
I'm inclined to believe that. Either way I just
created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-453 so that none of us lose track of it.
John
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi John, from spec point of view Jozef is right but I think it is
>important to mention that most of servers supports it otherwise it is
>hardly usable (using lib would be a nightmare).
>
>
>Romain Manni-Bucau
>Twitter: @rmannibucau
>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>2014-08-22 11:10 GMT+02:00 Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com>:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> no, the interceptor will only be enabled in war's WEB-INF/classes. Other
>> JARs need to enable the interceptor in their beans.xml file to use it.
>>
>> Jozef
>>
>>
>> On 08/21/2014 08:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Let's suppose I'm deploying a WAR file w/ multiple JAR files. The WAR
has a
>> beans.xml w/ interceptors defined in it. The JARs each have beans.xml, but
>> no interceptors defined within them.
>>
>> Should the interceptors in the WAR apply to all of the JAR files?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
5:43 p.m.
Since CDI 1.1 you can enable an interceptor, decorator or alternative
globally. This can be done either using the @Priority annotation or by
an extension.
Jozef
On 08/22/2014 01:21 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
@Romain
I'm inclined to believe that. Either way I just created
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-453 so that none of us lose track
of it.
John
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rmannibucau(a)gmail.com <mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi John, from spec point of view Jozef is right but I think it is
important to mention that most of servers supports it otherwise it is
hardly usable (using lib would be a nightmare).
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-22 11:10 GMT+02:00 Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com
<mailto:jharting@redhat.com>>:
> Hi John,
>
> no, the interceptor will only be enabled in war's
WEB-INF/classes. Other
> JARs need to enable the interceptor in their beans.xml file to
use it.
>
> Jozef
>
>
> On 08/21/2014 08:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Let's suppose I'm deploying a WAR file w/ multiple JAR files.
The WAR has a
> beans.xml w/ interceptors defined in it. The JARs each have
beans.xml, but
> no interceptors defined within them.
>
> Should the interceptors in the WAR apply to all of the JAR files?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
3526
days inactive
3528
days old
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
John D. Ament -
Jozef Hartinger -
Mark Struberg -
Romain Manni-Bucau