Antoine,
As seen, there could be Spring or other stakeholders who prefer either
minimum JDK, so let's see if they actually propose it what they suggest (or
in a draft upfront like some JSRs like MVC and others did)
Werner
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <
antoine(a)sabot-durand.net> wrote:
Werner,
Java EE 8 target is JDK 8 as we said before. But te goal of this document
is not to discuss with Bob and Juergen how they should use JDK 8 within
their spec, but to see if are willing to discuss our suggestion. When we’ll
find a general agreement it will be useful to go into such details.
Antoine
Le 8 sept. 2014 à 12:20, Werner Keil <werner.keil(a)gmail.com> a écrit :
Antoine/all,
Thanks for sharing. I also had a discussion (in his own Spring blog) with
Jürgen mainly about modularity, and the JDK minimum requirements for Spring
4.x. He confirmed, the "core" components of Spring 4.1 still run under as
low as Java 6, while some modules that can be dynamically (Spring-DM aka
OSGi;-) added may directly refer to Java 8, in which case you must run SE 8
or higher.
So while for Java 6/7 or below version of @Inject.next this:
public interface Provider<T> extends Iterable<T> {
/**
* Provides a fully-constructed and injected instance of {@code T}.
*/
T get();
[...]
looks fine, it seemed more than consequent, if you did
public interface Provider<T> extends Iterable<T>, Supplier<T> {
[...]
in a Java 8+ case;-)
Even without looking at Lambdas here in greater detail, it reused what
Java SE 8 introduced.
Again, that is something you, Bob, Jürgen and maybe the EE 8 Spec Leads
should discuss, what the reasonable minimum requirements for @Inject.next
are, if it's SE 8 or a lower version, though those of course may always
stick with the previous ones...
Werner
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:06 PM, <cdi-dev-request(a)lists.jboss.org> wrote:
> Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cdi-dev-request(a)lists.jboss.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cdi-dev-owner(a)lists.jboss.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-456) fix Bean#getBeanClass() definition
> (Romain Manni-Bucau (JIRA))
> 2. Enhancement proposition to JSR 330 (Antoine Sabot-Durand)
> 3. Re: With the end of Java Config... (Werner Keil)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 12:03:36 +0200
> From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>
> Subject: [cdi-dev] Enhancement proposition to JSR 330
> To: cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Message-ID: <D8CD5D26-82DB-4F64-89C5-93AD467FBC0B(a)sabot-durand.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> I received an answer from Bob Lee (off list). He likes te idea of us
> providing a proposal document. So I worked on it this WE.
> Here it is :
>
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KCzqodA8uzXED5DJrEUyl0x3dOUB5mBwL4KcV...
> <
>
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KCzqodA8uzXED5DJrEUyl0x3dOUB5mBwL4KcV...
> >
>
> Your comments and proposal are most welcome. I propose we discuss this
> point during our next meeting, and if we agree on the final content send it
> asap to have Bob and Juergen feeling about these suggestion.
>
>
> Antoine
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20140908/607a6499/at...
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
>
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
> End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 46, Issue 42
> ***************************************
>
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
intellectual property rights inherent in such information.