[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Antoine Sabot-Durand updated CDI-280:
-------------------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: While we implicitly included CDI-406 in this ticket we missed CDI-404. We should
analyse the impact of adding {{@Interceptor}} and {{@Decorator}} in the list of bean
defining annotations.)
clarify usage of 'bean' term usage in the spec
----------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-280
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-280
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Clarification
Reporter: Mark Struberg
Labels: CDI_api_chge, CDI_spec_chge, Ready_to_fix
Fix For: 1.2 Proposed
We should go to the spec and look up all 'bean' words as they are 5 different
meaning the word 'bean' is used for
* The Bean<T> extends Contextual<T>. Should be referred as 'Bean' or
'CDI Bean'
* The class which gets scanned. Should be referred as 'Bean Class' to
* The instance stored in the context. Should be referred to as 'Contextual
Instance'
* The proxy for a Contextual Instance should be referred to as 'Contextual
Reference'
* The type of an injection point should be referred to as 'InjectionPoint Type'
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira