[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Martin Kouba commented on CDI-404:
----------------------------------
Just a note: although it's not very clear from the spec, interceptors are beans with
scope {{@Dependent}}. See CDI spec, 6.4.1 Dependent objects:
{quote}
Many instances of beans with scope @Dependent belong to some other bean or Java EE
component class instance and are called dependent objects.
* Instances of decorators and interceptors are dependent objects of the bean instance they
decorate.
* ...
{quote}
So an interceptor from implicit bean archive should explicitly declare {{@Dependent}}
scope to be processed by the container.
Nevertheless making {{javax.interceptor.Interceptor}} a bean defining annotation might be
a good idea...
adding bean-defining annotations for Interceptor while setting
bean-discovery-mode="annotated"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-404
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-404
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Beans
Affects Versions: 1.1.PFD
Reporter: Tang Yong
[1] and [2] has reported an issue about
bean-discovery-mode="annotated". Although there are some workarounds for
the issue, I think that in the future, we should support interceptor
implict scanning while an user uses bean-discovery-mode="annotated".
Apparently, just as bean-discovery-mode="annotated", CDI Spec and
Interceptor Spec are disconnected.
[
1]:https://java.net/jira/browse/GLASSFISH-20667
[
2]:http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17258639/interceptor-issue-with-jav...
About detailed discussion, please seeing the following,
https://java.net/projects/javaee-spec/lists/users/archive/2013-09/message/7
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira