11:24 a.m.
All,
Take a look at https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-193
The CDI 1.0 spec contains two Process events - ProcessProducerMethod and ProcessProducer
field, which are subclasses of ProcessBean.
CDI 1.1 EDR adds two new events, which are subclasses of ProcessProducer, which are called
for producer fields and producer methods. They allow you to swap out the producer.
Of course, they are naturally named ProcessProducerMethod and ProcessProducerField, but
these names are taken (as subclasses of ProcessBean). As the ProcessBean subclasses are in
the 1.0 spec, we can't change them, so we must come up with new names for the
ProcessProducer subclasses.
I'm out of ideas about how to fix this.
Ideas?
8:13 a.m.
What about:
ProcessProducerMethodDefinition
ProcessProducerFieldDefinition
...any name will be confusing since we cannot change the superclass name :(
Martin
Dne 4.9.2012 17:24, Pete Muir napsal(a):
All,
Take a look at https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-193
The CDI 1.0 spec contains two Process events - ProcessProducerMethod and ProcessProducer
field, which are subclasses of ProcessBean.
CDI 1.1 EDR adds two new events, which are subclasses of ProcessProducer, which are
called for producer fields and producer methods. They allow you to swap out the producer.
Of course, they are naturally named ProcessProducerMethod and ProcessProducerField, but
these names are taken (as subclasses of ProcessBean). As the ProcessBean subclasses are in
the 1.0 spec, we can't change them, so we must come up with new names for the
ProcessProducer subclasses.
I'm out of ideas about how to fix this.
Ideas?
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
10:34 a.m.
Hmm. In my mind it's the existing (CDI 1.0) ones that represent the definition
(ProcessBean subclasses) whilst these ones allow you to adjust how the value of the
producers is computed at runtime.
If I could rewrite history, then I would change the existing ones to
ProcessProducerMethodBean and ProcessProducerFieldBean.
On 5 Sep 2012, at 13:13, Martin Kouba wrote:
What about:
ProcessProducerMethodDefinition
ProcessProducerFieldDefinition
...any name will be confusing since we cannot change the superclass name :(
Martin
Dne 4.9.2012 17:24, Pete Muir napsal(a):
> All,
>
> Take a look at https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-193
>
> The CDI 1.0 spec contains two Process events - ProcessProducerMethod and
ProcessProducer field, which are subclasses of ProcessBean.
>
> CDI 1.1 EDR adds two new events, which are subclasses of ProcessProducer, which are
called for producer fields and producer methods. They allow you to swap out the producer.
>
> Of course, they are naturally named ProcessProducerMethod and ProcessProducerField,
but these names are taken (as subclasses of ProcessBean). As the ProcessBean subclasses
are in the 1.0 spec, we can't change them, so we must come up with new names for the
ProcessProducer subclasses.
>
> I'm out of ideas about how to fix this.
>
> Ideas?
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
4250
days inactive
4251
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Martin Kouba -
Pete Muir