[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Pete Muir resolved CDI-348.
---------------------------
Resolution: Done
I've moved it to be bean class, not bean.
Clarify which beans "have" bean defining annotations
----------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-348
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-348
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Clarification
Components: Beans
Affects Versions: 1.1.PFD
Reporter: Jozef Hartinger
Assignee: Pete Muir
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 1.1.FD
{quote}Any bean which has scope type is said to have a bean defining annotation.{quote}
The spec makes this vague statement and provides two examples which only cover the two
simplest cases. What remains unclear is:
- if a bean class inherits a scope annotation definition from a superclass, should it be
discovered in an implicit bean archive?
- if a bean inherits a scope from a stereotype, should it be discovered in an implicit
bean archive?
- if a producer method / field has a scope annotation but the declaring bean is not a
bean with bean defining annotation, whould the producer be discovered?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira