On 27 Apr 2011, at 15:24, George Gastaldi wrote:
I was just browsing the issues, and found out one issue on the TBD
list that really shouldn´t be left out on CDI 1.1.
"Provide support for binding an invocation handler to an interface or
abstract class" -
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-110
In fact, it is the ServiceHandler feature implemented in Seam Solder.
There is a use case that is the same as listed on
http://docs.jboss.org/seam/3/solder/latest/reference/en-US/html/serviceha...
that makes it necessary and could be better adopted on other use cases
as well.
I think the reason I didn't add this to the proposal was that I didn't want to add
too many new features, and given that this can be implemented very easily as an add on, I
left it off.
Anyone else got a strong feeling on this?
I may also be responsible on implementing this.
How do you mean? That you would be able to write the spec changes for adding this
feature?
Pete