Antoine, Why do only some EG members have access to merge PRs? On May 3, 2016 9:44 AM, "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; wrote: > Hi guys, > > As you know we plan to release CDI 2.0 before the end of January. It > let's us around 6 months to complete the spec. > > I think we really should find a way to enhance our focus on reviewing > proposal and code. > Adding special Hangout meetings proved itself a good solution to go that > way, but I think we should also work on rules adoption for PR. > > So I propose that: > - PR should stay open at least one week. > - It could be merged (after at least a week) if 4 EG members votes for it > (+1 on the PR). > - As no one is error proof if someone has an objection to a PR to be > merged he could raise his concern and justify his objection. > - The following discussion should lead either to a revision of the PR or > a +1 from the objector > - If no agreement is reached, to avoid blocage a vote will be called on > this ML to adopt or reject the PR. > > I'm not a big fan of over processed team work, but we really have to > deliver. > For the moment I think we can avoid having too much process on ticket > choice (we don't have enough contributors to go that way) > > Wdyt ? > > Antoine > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the > code under the Apache License, Version 2 ( > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas > provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other > intellectual property rights inherent in such information. >