[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand commented on CDI-405: ------------------------------------------ Reproducing IRC discussion between [~pmuir] (pmuir) and [~antoinesabot-durand] (asd) about this ticket and corresponding PR {code} <+pmuir> asd: for https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/204 <+pmuir> I think the new wording is too verbose and wooly <+asd> +1. Your input as an english native speaker would be very appreciated here <+pmuir> I wonder if we can't say something like (i.e. to paraphrase) "The container must provide an implementation of the @RequestScoped, @ApplicationScoped and @SessionScoped annotations defined in [builtin_contexts] representing the standard scopes defined by the Java Servlets specification." <+pmuir> we would need to reword the second bullet as well, to keep the definitions consistent <+asd> with that you remove the idea that these context are not restrict to servlet scopes IMO <+asd> the main idea should be "it's like scope in servlet spec but it could be more" <+asd> the main issue with this is nowhere in the spec we indicate how a third party spec could extend @RequestScoped... <+pmuir> that I think we should add to 6.2 <+pmuir> "A context object may be defined for any of the built-in scopes" <+pmuir> agreed? <+asd> ok {code} So the reword should be simplified and a new mention should be put regarding built-in scopes extension. I'm modifying the PR with this new approach. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira