5:52 a.m.
I guess, this mail was meant to go to the list ;-)
Von: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com<mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com>>
Datum: Montag, 16. Dezember 2013 12:50
An: Arne Limburg
<arne.limburg@openknowledge.de<mailto:arne.limburg@openknowledge.de>>
Betreff: Re: [cdi-dev] Producer wrapper
I think the main issue is to avoid to make extensions hard/long to write (already too
complicated for common stuff IMO) so i dont like this solution.
It is great to have a clean design...it is better to have something usable. CDI needs to
work on the last quickly IMO before adding any feature.
Le 16 déc. 2013 12:38, "Arne Limburg"
<arne.limburg@openknowledge.de<mailto:arne.limburg@openknowledge.de>> a écrit
:
Hi,
A simple solution to this topic would be to state in the spec, that, if an
extension replaces an InjectionTarget or Producer it MUST provide a custom
Implementation of an ObserverMethod for every private observer method of
that bean.
WDYT? Maybe we should discuss this in the meeting this evening?
Regards,
Arne
Am 12.12.13 16:23 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter
<struberg@yahoo.de<mailto:struberg@yahoo.de>>:
1. Producer / InjectionTarget might create instances which are wrapped in
proxies.
2. event observer methods are allowed to be private and thus are not in
the proxies.
3. extensions are allowed to 'decorate' InjectionTargets and Producers.
This means that we need some unwrap method in the spec, right?
Currently this does not York.
LieGrue,
strub
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
5:54 a.m.
New subject: FW: Producer wrapper
Sure! Thks Arne.
Le 16 déc. 2013 12:52, "Arne Limburg" <arne.limburg(a)openknowledge.de> a
écrit :
I guess, this mail was meant to go to the list ;-)
Von: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com>
Datum: Montag, 16. Dezember 2013 12:50
An: Arne Limburg <arne.limburg(a)openknowledge.de>
Betreff: Re: [cdi-dev] Producer wrapper
I think the main issue is to avoid to make extensions hard/long to
write (already too complicated for common stuff IMO) so i dont like this
solution.
It is great to have a clean design...it is better to have something
usable. CDI needs to work on the last quickly IMO before adding any feature.
Le 16 déc. 2013 12:38, "Arne Limburg" <arne.limburg(a)openknowledge.de> a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
>
> A simple solution to this topic would be to state in the spec, that, if an
> extension replaces an InjectionTarget or Producer it MUST provide a custom
> Implementation of an ObserverMethod for every private observer method of
> that bean.
> WDYT? Maybe we should discuss this in the meeting this evening?
>
> Regards,
> Arne
>
> Am 12.12.13 16:23 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter <struberg(a)yahoo.de>:
>
> >
> >1. Producer / InjectionTarget might create instances which are wrapped in
> >proxies.
> >
> >2. event observer methods are allowed to be private and thus are not in
> >the proxies.
> >
> >3. extensions are allowed to 'decorate' InjectionTargets and Producers.
> >
> >
> >This means that we need some unwrap method in the spec, right?
> >Currently this does not York.
> >
> >LieGrue,
> >strub
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >cdi-dev mailing list
> >cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
8:32 a.m.
New subject: Producer wrapper
Romain,
I totally agree. Extension are a powerful tool but they are very intimidating to write for
newbie : CDI bootstrap lifecycle doesn’t give an impression of easiness ;). I think we
should think about a kind of « configuration layer » on top of extension for CDI 2.0 to
allow an easier way to create simple extension…
Antoine
Le 16 déc. 2013 à 12:54, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com> a écrit :
Sure! Thks Arne.
Le 16 déc. 2013 12:52, "Arne Limburg" <arne.limburg(a)openknowledge.de> a
écrit :
I guess, this mail was meant to go to the list ;-)
Von: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com>
Datum: Montag, 16. Dezember 2013 12:50
An: Arne Limburg <arne.limburg(a)openknowledge.de>
Betreff: Re: [cdi-dev] Producer wrapper
I think the main issue is to avoid to make extensions hard/long to write (already too
complicated for common stuff IMO) so i dont like this solution.
It is great to have a clean design...it is better to have something usable. CDI needs to
work on the last quickly IMO before adding any feature.
Le 16 déc. 2013 12:38, "Arne Limburg" <arne.limburg(a)openknowledge.de> a
écrit :
Hi,
A simple solution to this topic would be to state in the spec, that, if an
extension replaces an InjectionTarget or Producer it MUST provide a custom
Implementation of an ObserverMethod for every private observer method of
that bean.
WDYT? Maybe we should discuss this in the meeting this evening?
Regards,
Arne
Am 12.12.13 16:23 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter <struberg(a)yahoo.de>:
>
>1. Producer / InjectionTarget might create instances which are wrapped in
>proxies.
>
>2. event observer methods are allowed to be private and thus are not in
>the proxies.
>
>3. extensions are allowed to 'decorate' InjectionTargets and Producers.
>
>
>This means that we need some unwrap method in the spec, right?
>Currently this does not York.
>
>LieGrue,
>strub
>
>_______________________________________________
>cdi-dev mailing list
>cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
4102
days inactive
4102
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Antoine Sabot-Durand -
Arne Limburg -
Romain Manni-Bucau