Reword part of the @Vetoed section ---------------------------------- Key: CDI-319 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-319 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Reporter: Martin Kouba Assignee: Pete Muir Fix For: 1.1.FD I think the current wording of 3.13 "Vetoing types" is misleading now. E.g. @Vetoed on annotation (qualifier, stereotype) has no effect. Also the spec wording should be synced with @Vetoed javadoc. To sum it up: @Vetoed affects classes, interfaces, enums. * class -> no container lifecycle event (PAT), no bean or observer methods defined by the class will be installed * interface, enum -> no container lifecycle event (PAT) I suggest something similar: {quote} Any Java class, interface, enum or package may be prevented from being considered by CDI by adding the @Vetoed annotation. In particular, * any beans or observer methods defined by a class annotated with @Vetoed will not be installed * no container lifecycle events are fired for classes, interfaces or enums annotated with @Vetoed * when @Vetoed placed on package, all classes, interfaces or enums in the package are prevented from being considered by CDI {quote} The rest is ok.