[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Martin Kouba commented on CDI-667:
----------------------------------
bq. Session beans are and should still be considered as beans.
I agree. We should somehow copy the text from "17.4. Default bean discovery mode for
Java EE".
bq. For the trimming, it just add @Singleton and other Scope beans, which are over above
the cdi beans.
I think session bean annotations are not enough. I'm not sure but I remember it was
possible to use ejb descriptor instead of annotations.
Session beans in trimmed bean archive
-------------------------------------
Key: CDI-667
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-667
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Clarification
Reporter: Tomas Remes
Fix For: 2.0 .Final
Currently it is not obvious how session beans should be treated in trimmed bean archive.
In other words are they considered as beans or not?
IMO we should state that there are discovered as beans, but it's questionable.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)