[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Martin Kouba commented on CDI-547:
----------------------------------
Yep, it would return both ASYNC + SYNC, the same result one would expect for
{{fireAsync()}}. That's why the proposed name contains *ForFireAsync*.
The third option may also bring confusion - we will always return observer methods for
{{fireAsync()}}.
Resolving sync/async observer methods
-------------------------------------
Key: CDI-547
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-547
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Clarification
Reporter: Jozef Hartinger
There's the
[
BeanManager.resolveObserverMethods()|http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/api/2.0.ED...]
method for resolving observer methods.
With addition of sync/async events and observers it is not unclear what the semantics of
this methods are. We'll most likely need to add new or overloaded methods to make it
possible to resolve observers for sync/async events.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)