Yes. I created
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-461 and need to check CDI spec if it
is worth of clarification issue.
Thank's
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jozef Hartinger" <jharting(a)redhat.com>
To: "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com>, cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2015 9:11:11 AM
Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] unproxyable constraint for ejbs
Agreed. The test looks incorrect.
On 12/23/2014 09:07 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi
org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.interceptors.definition.broken.finalClassInterceptor.FinalMethodClassLevelMissile
will make the container throw a DeploymentException cause of public
final void finalManeuver() which is final...but it is not in the EJB
API so CDI shouldn't even know it.
Is the test buggy -
org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.interceptors.definition.broken.finalClassInterceptor.FinalMethodClassLevelInterceptorTest?
IMO this has not to be tested since the EJB container already does it.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.
--
Tomas Remes