Make sense remove it from the pom if we go to Java 8. :)
Can you share your problem with Java 9? (even though we don't have a final
version of Java 9 ATM)
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Geroge,
That's wonderful! Finally we can rewrite all those anonymous inner classes
with lambdas. And use streams. And sometimes Optional in the APIs :)
Do you plan to remove this from the root pom:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<argLine>-Xms256m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m</argLine>
</configuration>
</plugin>
It doesn't make sense anymore. But has been bugging me all the time when I
try to build Forge with Java 9 (it's an error there).
Cheers,
Ivan
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with that! :)
>
> +1 for Java 8.
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:23 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Forge users,
>>
>> For the next minor release, I'd like to make JDK8 the minimum
>> requirement.
>>
>> The JBoss Tools team is already using JDK8 as the minimum requirement
>> for their new versions. We are already running our build in JDK8 (with
>> sources set to 1.7 still)
>>
>> Is there any objection? Say it now or forever hold your peace, because
>> the Forge train never stops ;)
>>
>> Best Regards, love you all!
>>
>> George Gastaldi
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Cunha (soro)
>
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>
http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev